dc.contributor.author |
Jayasinghe, R.R. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-01-12T06:01:45Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-01-12T06:01:45Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2015 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Jayasinghe, R.R. 2015. Error Analysis on the Usage of Prepositions by the ESL Learners in Writing Tasks, p. 64, In: Proceedings of the International Postgraduate Research Conference 2015 University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, (Abstract), 339 pp. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/11116 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This study examines the patterns of three types of errors: omission errors, substitution errors
and addition errors in the usage of prepositions by ESL (English as a Second Language)
leaners in writing tasks. The study investigates the following: whether the school children in
lower grades tend to omit prepositions more often than in higher grades whereas in higher
grades, they substitute prepositions more often than in lower grades; whether omission errors
are more in [+Functional] prepositions than in [+Lexical] prepositions; and whether the
category criterion will be preserved in substitutions. Sinhala speaking ESL learners make
errors in prepositions mainly due to cross-linguistic differences between their first and second
languages, and as a result, many difficulties occur in ESL teaching. A pool of 260 Sinhala
students from four grades (Grade 4, Grade 6, Grade 8 and Grade 10) of two government
schools in Sri Lanka participated in this study, and the Survey Method was followed to
collect data. A picture story writing task where prepositions needed to be abundantly used
was administered to these students and they were instructed to identify the story depicted in
the pictures and to present it in writing. The errors in each prepositional category: Adverbial
prepositions, Semi-lexical prepositions, Particles and Functional prepositions were counted.
Each error was further categorized as omission, substitution and addition. Percentage of each
error type in each grade was calculated to find out which error types were most frequent and
for which category. Substitution errors were further analyzed to see whether substitutions
respected categorical distinctions. Quantitative analysis was carried out using SPSS 2012,
and interaction effects and category-wise analysis were computed. Findings concluded that
there were more omission errors in the lower grades and more substitution errors in higher
grades, and the learners generally respected the category rule in their substitutions. These
findings can be used in the ESL classroom to facilitate teaching English prepositions. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Kelaniya |
en_US |
dc.subject |
ESL |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Omission errors |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Substitution errors |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Addition errors |
en_US |
dc.title |
Error Analysis on the Usage of Prepositions by the ESL Learners in Writing Tasks |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |