dc.contributor.author |
Deepananda, K.H.M.A. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Amarasinghe, U.S. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Jayasinghe-Mudalige, U.K. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-01-21T03:48:12Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-01-21T03:48:12Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2015 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Deepananda, K.H.M.A., Amarasinghe, U.S. and Jayasinghe-Mudalige, U.K. 2015. Institutional robustness averts Hardin’s tragedy of the commons in the community-based beach seine fisheries in Sri Lanka, p. 202, In: Proceedings of the International Postgraduate Research Conference 2015 University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, (Abstract), 339 pp. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/11262 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Small scale coastal fisheries accounts for nearly 40% of world fish catches and provide direct
employment for more than 90% of the world fishers employed in capture fisheries.
Subsequent recognition of the failures of centralized fisheries management led the
governments to accept community-based management as an invaluable means to formulate
fisheries management. Such traditional management practices exist in beach seine fisheries of
Sri Lanka. Study ascertains and documents the rules and norms that are in general not
formerly codified in writing, and evaluate empirically the compliance of elements of
customary governance with Ostrom‘s modified design principles (MDP) for long enduring
commons management systems. Eight beach seine fisher communities were studied using
standard ethnographic methods, and evaluation of compliance with MDP was carried out by
administering structured questionnaires. Fishing rights in contiguous sea were vested to the
villagers who lived in the sea front, as a residential proximity right. Due to this tradition, the
ownership of a beach seine and fishing rights came in three ways identified as: exclusive
right, primary rights and secondary right. Sole authority for governing the commons was
vested to community organization termed ―madelsamithi‖, considered as the local
administrative unit. Institution governing the commons addressed the excludability problem
by defining fishing territory, eligibility rules and intercommunity access rule, while
subtractability problem was addressed by gear rules, temporal allocation rules, first comer
rules, fishing behaviour rules, conservation rules, and rules for distribution of benefits.
Institutional architecture of beach seine fisher communities exhibited the high compliance
with MDP. Out of the 11 MDP, fisher communities showed very high compliance with four
MDP and high compliance with six MDP. Only one MDP had a lower level compliance. As
empirical evaluation on architecture of customary institutions shows high compliance with
MDP, beach seine fisher communities can be treated as those govern commons through selfgoverning
institutions. Beach seining in southern Sri Lanka is, therefore an example for wellmanaged
commons that relies on strong, locally crafted rules as well as evolved norms, where
institutional and governance mechanisms have essentially averted the ―tragedy of the
commons‖. Study provides the starkness to the notion that local actors in tropical communitybased
marine resource systems overcome the tragedy of the commons through robust selfgoverning
institutions. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Kelaniya |
en_US |
dc.subject |
common pool resources |
en_US |
dc.subject |
coastal fisheries |
en_US |
dc.subject |
sustainability |
en_US |
dc.subject |
customary rules |
en_US |
dc.subject |
fisheries governance |
en_US |
dc.subject |
modified design principles |
en_US |
dc.title |
Institutional robustness averts Hardin’s tragedy of the commons in the community-based beach seine fisheries in Sri Lanka |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |