Digital Repository

Prevalence of asthma and comparison of ventilator capacity of asthmatics (when free of asthma) and non asthmatics among workers in selected garment factories

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Abeysena, C. en_US
dc.contributor.author Jayawardana, P. en_US
dc.contributor.author Wickramasinha, W.P.K. en_US
dc.contributor.author Dassanayake, I.S. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2016-02-02T07:09:24Z en_US
dc.date.available 2016-02-02T07:09:24Z en_US
dc.date.issued 2009 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Journal of the College of Community Physicians of Sri Lanka. 2009;14(Sup 1): 8 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1391-3174
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/11514
dc.description Oral Presentation Abstract (OP-02), 14th Annual Academic Sessions College of Community Physicians of Sri Lanka, 9th-12th September 2009, Colombo en_US
dc.description.abstract INTRODUCTION: Asthma has been reported to be common among garment factory workers. Objective: To determine the prevalence of asthma and to compare the lung functions among asthmatics and non asthmatics among garment factory workers. METHODS: A descriptive comparison study was conducted among 774 workers of selected garment factories in the Ekala Industiral Area, Ja ela. All workers who have served for a minimum period of one year in the factory were included in the study. An interviewer administered questionnaire was used to assess personal details and presence of wheezing, dysponoea and cough and other relevant data. All those with wheezing and those with presence of both cough and dyspnoea in the absence of wheezing during the past one year were considered as asthmatics. Spirometry was performed using an electronic spirometer. Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), Forced Expiratory Volume in first second of FVC (FEV) and Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) were assessed. The ventilatory capacity was compared among asthmatics and non asthmatics using Student T test, Mann Whitney U test or chi-squired test. Results: The prevalence of asthma was 30% (95%CI: 26.7%, 33%). The mean ventilator capacity of asthmatics and non asthmatics respectively were as follows FVC: 2.24 L versus 2.39 L (p<0.05), FEV-i.o: 2.17 L versus 2.37 L (p<0.001), PEFR {geometric mean): 5.87 L/sec versus 7.17 L/sec (p<0.001). The mean difference between the predicted normal values and observed values among asthmatics and non asthmatics were as follows: FVC: 0.53 L versus 0.58 L (p>0.05), FEVro: 0.30 L versus 0.25 L (p>0.05), PEFR (median): 1.21 L/sec versus 0.45 L/sec (p<0.001). Ninety three (40.3%) of asthmatics and 149 (27.5%) non-asthmatics had PEFR <80% of the predicted which was statistically significant (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Prevalence of asthma was high among garment factory workers. Ventilatory capacity and predicted normal values of asthmatics when free of asthma were affected in comparison to non asthmatics. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher College of the Community Physicians of Sri Lanka en_US
dc.subject Asthma en_US
dc.subject Prevalence en
dc.subject Comparative Study en
dc.subject Respiratory Function Tests en
dc.title Prevalence of asthma and comparison of ventilator capacity of asthmatics (when free of asthma) and non asthmatics among workers in selected garment factories en_US
dc.type Conference Abstract en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference Papers
    Papers presented at local and international conferences by the Staff of the Faculty of Medicine

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account