Digital Repository

Response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: tumour regression and lymph node status

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ratnayake, S.A.G.R.
dc.contributor.author Hewavisenthi, S.J.de S.
dc.date.accessioned 2016-04-11T05:46:28Z
dc.date.available 2016-04-11T05:46:28Z
dc.date.issued 2002
dc.identifier.citation Sri Lanka Medical Association, 115th Anniversary Academic Sessions. 2002; 44 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0009-0895
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/12587
dc.description Oral Presentation Abstract (OP 38), 115th Anniversary Academic Sessions, Sri Lanka Medical Association, 20-23 March 2002 Colombo, Sri Lanka en_US
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) prior to mastectomy is used to treat locally advanced breast carcinoma. This study assessed the response of breast cancer patients to NAT. METHODS: In a prospective study on 17 patients with carcinoma of the breast (16 females; age range 34—71 years) subjected to NAT prior to mastectomy, reduction in tumour size and the residual microscopic tumour percentage graded as, 0% - complete regression, 1-19% - marked regression, 20-79% - moderate regression, 80-99% - minimal regression, 100% - no regression, was assessed. Number of lymph nodes harvested and the number containing metastases (positivity) was compared with a control group of breast cancer patients (age and stage matched) undergoing mastectomy without NAT from a unit with a different treatment policy. RESULTS: Tumour size before NAT (mean 4.1cms) compared with that after NAT (mean l.Scms) was statistically significant (p<0.05). Microscopic assessment of residual tumour percentage showed 4 (23.5%) with complete regression, 2 (11.9%) with marked regression, 4 (23.5%) with moderate regression, 6 (35%) with minimum regression and 1 (5.8) with no regression. Neither the mean lymph node harvest of 11 (range 6-20) nor the mean lymph node positivity of 1.7 (range 0-8) in the NAT group were significantly different from values obtained for the control group [mean lymph node harvest 9.7 (range 4-18); mean lymph node positivity 2 (range 0-8)] (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: NAT causes macroscopic and microscopic reduction in tumour size in breast cancer. However, there is no significant difference on the therapeutic effect on axillary lymph nodes between patients receiving NAT and those undergoing mastectomy alone. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Sri Lanka Medical Association en_US
dc.subject Neoadjuvant Therapy en_US
dc.subject.mesh Breast Neoplasms en
dc.title Response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: tumour regression and lymph node status en_US
dc.type Conference Abstract en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference Papers
    Papers presented at local and international conferences by the Staff of the Faculty of Medicine

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account