dc.contributor.author |
Pinidiyapathirage, M.J. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Wimalarathne, O. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Gunasekara, W.P.A.D. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-05-31T04:01:32Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-05-31T04:01:32Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2006 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
The Bulletin of the Sri Lanka College of Microbiologists. 2006; 04(1): 17 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
1391-930x |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/13307 |
|
dc.description |
Oral Presentation (OP 07) The bulletin of the Sri Lanka College of Microbiologists, 21st-23rd September 2006, Colombo |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
OBJECTIVE: With increased availability, accessibility and safety of rabies post exposure treatment (PET), costs borne by the Government in the purchase of anti-rabies vaccines have increased dramatically. This study was conducted to identify exposure characteristics of patients presenting to an anti-rabies treatment unit (ARU) and to propose measures that could minimise PET use. METHOD: A hospital based descriptive study was carried out in the ARU of the National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL), An interviewer administered questionnaire assessed socio-demographic characteristics and the nature of exposure of patients. Treatment received was obtained from patient records. RESULTS: All consenting, first visit patients (n-266) presented during a period of one week to the ARU with an exposure history to a suspected rabid animal were studied. Mean age of those exposed was 36.6 years (SD 16.6). Exposure to dogs (208, 78.2%) was the commonest followed by exposure to cats (33, 12.4%). Majority were exposed to domesticated animals (172, 64.7%) which were unvaccinated or did not have reliable proof of vaccination (167, 62.8%). Of the 266, 13 (4.9%) did not need PET, 51 (19.2%) needed both anti-rabies inactivated tissue culture vaccine (ARV) and anti rabies serum and202(75.9%) needed ARV only. CONCLUSION: Majority of the exposures that needed PET was to domesticated dogs which were unvaccinated or had no reliable proof of vaccination. Importance of regular vaccination of pets and safe-keeping of animal vaccination records should be stressed to the general public and awareness of responsible pet ownership should be raised among the public. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Sri Lanka College of Microbiologists |
en_US |
dc.subject |
anti-rabies treatment |
en_US |
dc.title |
Exposure characteristics of patients presenting to an anti-rabies treatment unit |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |