Management of coastal resources: Lessons learnt from two coastal communities occupying the west coast of Sri Lanka
Kodituwakku, K.A.R.K.; Wazir, S.R.; Aththanayake, A.M.H.L.; Silva, T.M.S.D.G.; Malshani, E.M.S.; Partheepan, K.; Thevendran, K.; Udayanga, N.W.B.A.L.; Sumanapala, A.P.; Jayanga, B.H.N.; Chandrasekara, W.U.
Citation:
Kodituwakku, K.A.R.K., Wazir, S.R., Aththanayake, A.M.H.L., Silva, T.M.S.D.G., Malshani, E.M.S., Partheepan, K., Thevendran, K., Udayanga, N.W.B.A.L., Sumanapala, A.P., Jayanga, B.H.N. and Chandrasekara, W.U. 2016. Management of coastal resources: Lessons learnt from two coastal communities occupying the west coast of Sri Lanka. In Proceedings of the International Research Symposium on Pure and Applied Sciences (IRSPAS 2016), Faculty of Science, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. p 105.
Date:
2016
Abstract:
The livelihood of the coastal communities is mostly dependent upon the natural
coastal resources. Questionnaire based field surveys were carried out focusing on the
communities in two coastal towns on the west coast of Sri Lanka, Negombo and
Chilaw, with an objective of evaluating and assessing the governance and the
sustainable utilization and management of coastal resources there. The survey was
carried out in December 2013, and consisted of face-to-face interviews and gathering
information from households along the beach border that were selected through
systematic sampling approach and from randomly selected stake holders on the
beach, to satisfy the questionnaire. The chief executive officers of local government
authorities viz. regional office of the Coast Conservation and Coastal Resources
Management Department, Municipal Councils, Police Stations, and where necessary
the incumbent of the Catholic Church in the area, were also interviewed to evaluate
their role over the governance and management of the coastal resources.
The analysis of survey data revealed that the major resource based income generation
activities in Negombo beach was tourism (68%) while in Chilaw it was fisheries
(75%). The major environmental issues in Negombo beach were pollution (35%),
littering the beach by local tourists (27%) and illegal building constructions (20%),
while those in Chilaw were pollution (43%), illegal house constructions (25%) and
coastal erosion (26%). Therefore, the Negombo beach was cleaner (76%) than the
Chilaw beach (27%). Since the major income generation activity in Negombo beach
was tourism, the local government authorities paid special attention in maintaining
law and order, carrying out beach cleaning programmes, daily removal of litter and
waste, carrying out community awareness programmes on the importance of beach
on tourism and usage of soft and hard engineering techniques to prevent coastal
erosion. In addition, every tourist hotel was found to clean the beach façades under
their purview, and beach vendors also supported these programmes. In fisheries
dominated Chilaw, the inputs by the local government authorities were minimum
except the Urban Council collecting household waste on weekly basis from the
roadside bins. However, the village has a very strong community based management
strategy led by the Catholic Church. The church plays a pivotal role in harmonizing
the village, educating villagers on the proper disposal of garbage, preventing sand
mining and use of harmful fishing practices, and coordinating the local government
authorities to maintain proper sanitation as well as law, order and peace in the area.
In contrast, the tourism dominated coastal zone in Negombo is managed by a strong
co-management strategy that involves the contribution of the local government
authorities and major stakeholders on the beach such as tourist hotels and the local
community on the governess and sustainable management of the coastal zone.
Show full item record