Abstract:
The Sri Lankan paddy sector is endowed with the special attention of the government
and provided with input subsidies, in consideration of dual facets of its strategic
importance. One of these two aspects is that the subsidy is vital in achieving the self
sufficiency of rice as the staple food production. On the other hand, the subsidy helps
in ensuring income of paddy farmers since paddy cultivation is less profitable and
less attractive occupation in Sri Lanka, without government support. Sri Lanka has
been subsidizing fertilizer more than half a century and the subsidy programme
introduced 2005 onwards was broadened absorbing more than ninety percent of the
import price of fertilizer by the government. The ongoing controversial
commentaries on continuation of the fertilizer subsidy always emphasize the huge
cost incurred by the government for granting this subsidy as well as the adverse
effect of fertilizer overuse on environment and public health.
The key objective of this thesis is to determine whether there is a positive impact of
fertilizer subsidy on paddy cultivation of Sri Lanka. The analysis is based on the
secondary data issued by leading government institutions such as the Central Bank of
Sri Lanka, the Department of Census and Statistics and the Department of
Agriculture, pertaining to fertilizer consumption of Urea, TSP and MOP, Annual
average paddy yield and the extent of harvested area in relation to past 54 years.
Initially, the relationship between the pairs of the variables of fertilizer consumption,
paddy yield, extent of paddy harvested area and extent of paddy sown area were
tested using correlation analysis. ANOVA model was fitted with the view to
accomplishing the objective for determining the impact of fertilizer subsidy on usage
of fertilizer, paddy yield and the extent of paddy harvested area. Under post hoc
comparison, Tukey HSD test was conducted in order to ascertain the conditions
where significant differences are shown.
The study revealed that there is a consi erable positive impact of fertilizer subsidy
towards the productivity improvement of rice cultivation in Sri Lanka. The results
indicate that there is a positive impact of subsidy on usage of fertilizer, average
paddy yield and paddy harvested extent of area in the country. Further it was found
that there is a positive correlation between the each variables of fertilizer usage,
average paddy yield, paddy harvested and paddy sown extent of area.
The findings suggest that removal of subsidy would reduce the yield growth of paddy
cultivation and adversely affect the self sufficiency of the staple food commodity
leaving the rural farmer unstable. Therefore, in solving the puzzle of lessening
budgetary burden and eliminating the social cost stemmed from overuse of fertilizer,
the policy makers have to brainstorm in order to find the best strategic solution to
manage this attentively, without affecting the growth of paddy yield.