dc.contributor.author |
Karunaratne, W.C.D. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Chandratilake, M. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Marambe, K. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-10-24T06:16:10Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-10-24T06:16:10Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Sri Lanka Medical Association, 130th Anniversary International Medical Congress. 2017;62(Supplement 1):202 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
0009-0895 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/17867 |
|
dc.description |
Poster Presentation Abstract (PP 102), 130th Anniversary International Medical Congress, Sri Lanka Medical Association, 13th-16th July 2017 Colombo, Sri Lanka |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES: Hermeneutic phenomenology is a qualitative study design to understand individual learning experiences from the beholder’s perspective (phenomenology) while appreciating the subjective interpretation of them by the researcher with essential prejudices for understanding the concept (hermeneutic). Clinical reasoning is a multifaceted, dynamic, individualized and evolving construct. Therefore, how junior doctors learn clinical reasoning in practice was explored using this approach. The aim is to share this methodological experience with prospective researchers to be used for similar purposes. METHODS: A total of 18 junior doctors (Males: 7, Females: 11) from four major clinical disciplines participated in individual in-depth semi-structured interviews. Lived-experiences were encouraged more during the interviews than the perceptions complying with phenomenology. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed according to the Ritchie and Spencer framework using the Atlas.ti software. The above framework was chosen to maximize the diversity of interpretation. Three personnel with the same academic background but different levels of experience developed the coding framework. This resulted in identification of codes from participants’ expressions (first-order constructs; layered by the researcher’s interpretations of these constructs (second-order constructs). The second-order constructs gave the impetus for emerging themes for the coding framework. Three frameworks of three coders were compared; consensus and deviations were included in developing the final coding framework. RESULTS: The framework revealed rich and diverse accounts of how junior doctors conceptualized clinical reasoning, the presence of numerous interpersonal and contextual factors driving, facilitating and supporting learning and also hindering the learning process. CONCLUSION: Hermeneutic phenomenology can be used effectively to understand complex phenomena like clinical reasoning. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Sri Lanka Medical Association |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Hermeneutic phenomenology |
en_US |
dc.title |
Using hermeneutic phenomenology approach to explore how junior doctors learn clinical reasoning in practice |
en_US |
dc.type |
Conference Abstract |
en_US |