Digital Repository

Abdominal suture rectopexy without large bowel resection for rectal prolapse does not result in constipation: data from prospective bowel function evaluation, anorectal physiology and transit studies

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sabaratnam, V. Y.
dc.contributor.author Rathnayake, G.
dc.contributor.author Deen, K.I.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-02-18T09:35:39Z
dc.date.available 2019-02-18T09:35:39Z
dc.date.issued 2003
dc.identifier.citation The Annual Sessions of the College of Surgeons of Sri Lanka and SAARC Surgical Care Society.2003, P. 172 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/19949
dc.description Free Papers Abstract, The Annual Sessions of the College of Surgeons of Sri Lanka and SAARC Surgical Care Society,13rd -17th August 2003 Kandy, Sri Lanka. en_US
dc.description.abstract INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, suture rectopexy has been combined with sigmoid resection for rectal prolapse to prevent postoperative constipation. Furthermore, preservation of lateral ligaments will not result in constipation. Suture rectopexy alone without resection, is being popularised. OBJECTIVE: To study the influence of suture rectopexy without resection on colonic transit and postoperative constipation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients (median (range) age 32(19-82) years) with rectal prolapse underwent suture rectopexy alone without division of lateral ligaments from March 1999. Prospectively, bowel function and anorectal physiology (ARP) were evaluated before and after surgery in a subset of 15 patients. Follow up (median, range) has been 12 (1-42) months. RESULTS: Follow up was complete in 36 patients. Recurrent prolapse was seen in 5 (full thickness 3 (8.3%); mucosa! prolapse 2 (5.5%)). Physiological data in a subset of 15 patients revealed no significant difference in anorectal physiology before and 3 months after the operation (table). Similarly there was no significant difference in the rate of evacuation of transit markers on day 3 and 5. Maximum resting pressure (median and range) was 25(7-50) mmHg and 33.2(7- 80, P value 0.026) before and after surgery. The median (range) maximum squeeze pressure were 67.5(19-i30) and 90(28 - 157, P 0.!64) before and after surgery. The maximum tolerable volume (ml) was 230 ( ! 80 -340) before surgery and 200 (50-290) after surgery (P. 0.139). Transit (as an excretion percentage) was 100% before and after surgery (P = 0. 197). CONCLUSION: Abdominal suture rectopexy without resection for rectal prolapse improves constipation and does not result in significant change in colonic transit. We recommend this procedure either by open operation or by laparoscopy. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher The College of Surgeons of Sri Lanka and SAARC Surgical Care Society en_US
dc.subject Constipation en_US
dc.title Abdominal suture rectopexy without large bowel resection for rectal prolapse does not result in constipation: data from prospective bowel function evaluation, anorectal physiology and transit studies en_US
dc.type Conference abstract en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference Papers
    Papers presented at local and international conferences by the Staff of the Faculty of Medicine

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account