dc.contributor.author |
Gunasekara, P. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Handunnetti, S.M. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Premawansa, S. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kaluarachchi, P. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Karunatilake, C. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ratnayake, I.P. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Dias, R. K. S. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Premakumara, G. A. S. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Dasanayake, W. M. D. K. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Seneviratne, S.L. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
de Silva, R. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-01-27T09:53:15Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-01-27T09:53:15Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2019 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Gunasekara, P. Handunnetti, S.M. Premawansa, S. Kaluarachchi, P. Karunatilake, C. Ratnayake, I.P. Dias, R. K. S. Premakumara, G. A. S. Dasanayake, W. M. D. K. Seneviratne, S.L. and de Silva, R.(2019). Diagnosis of Vespa affinis venom allergy:use of immunochemical methods and a passive basophil activation test, Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/20850 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Background: Allergy to Vespa affinis venom is common in the Asia Pacific region. Venom preparations for diagnosis
are not commercially available for this species.
Methods: The prominent allergens in V. affinis venom were identifiedusing immunochemical methods. Use of
ImmunoCAP of Vespula vulgaris crude venom/its components and a passive basophil activation test (BAT) in the
diagnosis of patients who had anaphylaxis to V. affinis venom (n = 30) were also accessed. The IgE double-positivity
rates (positive to both hornet and honeybee) in ImmunoCAP and the passive BAT were determined.
Results: High IgE reactivity was seen with the five allergens in V. affinis venom; 96% (29/30) for 34 and 24 kDa, 93%
(28/30) for 45 kDa and 90% (27/30) reactivity for the 100 and 80 kDa respectively. IgE cross-reactivity was low with
ImmunoCAP using V. vulgaris venom (43%; 13/30) and Ves v1 (3%; 1/30), but relatively high with Ves v5 (73%; 22/30).
All patients (100%) were positive to V. affinis venom in passive BAT. In ImmunoCAP, a high double-positivity rate (76%;
23/30) was detected while no double-positivity was detected in passive BAT.
Conclusions: High IgE reactivity for five allergens of V. affinis points to the potential of using these allergens in
component resolved diagnosis (CRD). The passive BAT has shown its importance as a promising diagnostic tool with
high accuracy. It would be particularly useful in cases with doubtful double-positive results of other diagnostic tests. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology |
en_US |
dc.subject |
CD63 |
en_US |
dc.subject |
IgE cross-reactivity |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Insect venom allergy |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Passive basophil activation test |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Vespa affinis |
en_US |
dc.title |
Diagnosis of Vespa affinis venom allergy:use of immunochemical methods and a passive basophil activation test |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |