dc.contributor.author |
Mettananda, K.C.D. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Silva, S.B.K. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Thampoe, R.S. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Batagoda, B.M.S.M. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-02-15T06:40:26Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-02-15T06:40:26Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2019 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Annual academic sessions (SIMCon), Sri Lanka College of Internal Medicine. 2019; 3: 56. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/21980 |
|
dc.description |
Proceedings and abstracts of the 3rd annual academic sessions of the Sri Lanka college of Internal Medicine, 07th – 09th November, 2019. Colombo. Sri Lanka. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
BACKGROUND: Guidelines on aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) has changed. There are no data on aspirin use for primary prevention from Sri Lanka or South Asia. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe antiplatelet use in primary prevention and its' justification in relation to latest guidelines in a cohort of patients with CV risk factors attending a follow-up medical clinic since 2007 of a community surveys of urban Sri Lanka. METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted of all patients with CV risk factors but without previous CVDs attending the above clinic from March 2018 -March 2019. Data were collected using an interviewer administered questionnaire. Patients' 10-year CV risk was calculated with WHO charts (SEAR B). Data were analyzed using SPSS-version 22. RESULTS: 170(137(80.6%) female, mean age 66.0± (6.70) years) were studied. Prevalence of CV risk factors; diabetes-mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and smoking were 80(47.1%), 114(67.5%), 150(89.3. %), 4(2.4%) respectively. 24(14.1%) were on antiplatelet for primary prevention. All were on aspirin. Aspirin prescription was justifiable in 4(25.0%) who were 50-69 years and had a 10-year CV risk of more than 10% according to US preventive task force recommendations. However, 7(16.3%) patients aged 70-years or more were on antiplatelet without justification. None of the patients have had serious adverse effects with aspirin. However, 50% had symptoms of gastritis. CONCLUSIONS: Even though antiplatelet use for primary prevention is not common in this cohort of urban Sri Lankans, a significant proportion of elderly were on antiplatelet without justification. Further, half of the patients experienced symptoms related to antiplatelet related side effects. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Sri Lanka College of Internal Medicine |
en_US |
dc.subject |
cardiovascular diseases |
en_US |
dc.title |
Prevalence of antiplatelet use for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases and its' justification among an urban Sri Lankan cohort of patients with cardiovascular risk factors |
en_US |
dc.type |
Conference abstract |
en_US |