Abstract:
Introduction: The psychological and social issues experienced by family members of missing persons are diferent from normal grief following the death of a loved one. The term “Ambiguous loss” describes this psychological
phenomenon. Ambiguous loss acts as a barrier to adjusting to grief, leading to symptoms of depression and intra
and interpersonal relational conficts. An in-depth phenomenological understanding of this subjective experience is
important.
Method: A qualitative study was conducted among close family members of persons who had gone missing during
the civil confict and the 2004 tsunami in southern Sri Lanka following formal ethical approval from an university ethics review committee. Purposive and snowballing sampling methods were used to recruit the participants. Theoretical
sample saturation was achieved with 24 family members of missing persons. Responders were mothers, fathers, wives,
husbands, and siblings of missing individuals. In-depth interviews were recorded with the help of a semi-structured
guide, after informed consent. The recordings were transcribed and coded by three independent investigators. The
investigators through consensus arrived at the phenomenological themes and grounded them through refexivity.
The triangulation process involved cross-checking observational notes made by the interviewers and consulting the
interviewees.
Results: We interviewed 24 frst degree relatives of missing individuals. Twenty-one of the interviewees were unsure
about the fate of the missing individual, while three of them believed the missing individual to be dead. Of the 24
missing individuals, 20 were males and 18 had gone missing in civil conficts and 6 in the Indian Ocean Tsunami.
Six predominant phenomenological themes were identifed. Those were lack of closure, hope, guilt, helplessness,
perpetual sufering, and an emotional vacuum. These phenomenological experiences are highlighted by the interviewees through a range of utterances that hold profound cultural, social and emotional signifcance of unresolved
and vacillating grief.
Conclusion: The highlighted phenomenology of grief in surviving family members of those who go missing following traumatic events demands a response from health and social services in every country that experiences disaster.
The surviving loved one is ‘locked in grief’ indefnitely and future research on evidence-based interventions to overcome this predicament is warranted.
