Surge-capacity of the preventive healthcare institutions for the management of dengue in the Kurunegala District

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The surge-capacity is defined as the ability to obtain adequate ‘Staff, Supplies, Structures and Systems’ to provide sufficient care to meet the immediate needs of an influx of patients following a large-scale incident or outbreak. The aim of the study was to describe the surge- capacity of the preventive healthcare institutions for the management of dengue in Kurunegala district. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among all institutions (n=28) in 2019. An interviewer-administered tool was formulated according to the ‘Science of Surge Theory’ and ‘CO-S-TR Model’. There was basic-level (26 to 50%), moderate-level (51 to 75%) and high- level (>75%) surge-capacities for 10 broad areas of the assessment. RESULTS: The majority of the institutions (69.2%; n=18) had inadequate staff-capacity. Three-fourth (76.0%; n=19) did not have a written plan for preparedness. The higher proportion (n=19; 73.1%) had focal points, Personal Protective Equipment (AE) (65.4%; n=17), chemical for mosquito control (92.3%; n=24), and fogging-instrument (88.5%, n=23). The basic-level capacity existed in the areas of staff mobilization (53.8%; n=14), management of staff (76.9%; n=20), triage of cases (76.9%; n=20), and transportation (46.2%; n=12). The moderate-level capacity was existed in the areas of commanding (42.3%; n=11), controlling (38.5%; n=10), coordinating (61.5%; n=16), supplying of special needs (50.0%; n=13) and tracking of the cases (76.9%; n=20). The higher proportion (84.6%; n=22) had inadequate overall-surge capacity for the management of dengue. CONCLUSION: There is a need for improvement of surge capacity of the preventive healthcare institutions and capacity development programmes need to be initiated.