Abstract:
Regional disparity of development has been the focus in many discussions on
development issues in the third world during the past three decades. The economic
growth and modernization are skewed in favour of metropolitan core area in the Western
Province of Sri Lanka due to numerous historical and geographical factors.The more
developed and highly urbanized Colombo Metropolitan Region (CMR) that approximates
the Western Province of the island has emerged as the centre of gravity in the national
economy. This region had a population of over 5.3 million in 2001(27.89 per cent of total
population of the country) concentrated into 5 per cent of the total land area. The
counter forces of polarisation, such as spread effects have not been so vital even within
the immediate peripheries of the core area. The widening inequalities at local levels
caused disintegration of socio-economic systems even within the fast changing areas
like Gampaha district of Sri Lanka. The present paper is an analysis of the prevailing
spatial inequality of the development in the district and an exploration into causes and
consequences of underdevelopment of peripheral rural areas.The Western coastal belt
of the district enjoyed benefits of the recent developments in the metropolitan economy,
through expanding physical infrastructure, industrialisation and employment generation.
According to the explanations of National Human Development Report (1998), as well as
different authors like O’Hare and Barrett (1996) and Moor (1985), Gampaha is identified
as the most developed district of Western Province as well as in Sri Lanka. However,
according to the Gini coefficient of income and percentage of income received by the
poorest 40% of household, Gampaha district indicates an unsatisfactory situation of
development.
The weakening of the agricultural base in the district as a whole was experienced during
the last few decades, although the dependence on small farm sector by the majority of
households in these areas have been major characteristics of this region. Weak
backward linkages of modern industrial economy with rural periphery, insufficient
services and infrastructure facilities are seen as key issues related to this backwardness,
according to the survey. This study closely observed micro-level variations in
development in the selected divisions of the district, with special reference to spatial
patterns of poverty and migration and employment structure that are related to the
peripheral backwardness. Land use changes associated with industrialization and
suburban growth and concentration of services into few centres are among key areas of
the discussion. Validity of available theoretical and empirical knowledge in explaining
ongoing spatial changes in the district is evaluated in the conclusion.