Abstract:
This paper suggests the necessity to reconstruct existing corporate governance
mechanisms of Sri Lankan companies by analyzing the collapse of Pramuka Savings
and Development Bank Ltd. (PSDB) in Sri Lanka. Corporate governance is a subject of
great current concern, not only in developed countries, but also in developing countries
that are in the throes of economic reforms. In the context of prevailing governance
issues, the argument that “Existing governance systems in the Sri Lankan corporate
sector should be geared up to the requirements of the corporate stakeholders” is
selected as the underlying theme of the study. Corporate governance is the system by
which businesses are directed and controlled. Several financial collapses of companies
in the country and around the world have created uncertainty in financial markets and
have shaken investors’ confidence. Therefore, the issue that corporate ‘influence’ is
disproportionate to ‘responsibility’ is considered as the main issue of the study.
The main objective of the research is to assess the relevance of findings of the study to
enhance governance practices in Sri Lankan corporate sector by assessing the theme in
multiple perspectives and by focusing on best practices and principles of corporate
governance.
Methodologically, the research is more of a theoretical paper supported by empirical
evidence. The theme of the study and the selected case (PSDB) were analyzed in three
perspectives namely: Agency Perspective, Stakeholder Perspective and Institutional
Theory Perspective. Selection of the three perspectives is supported by international
cases the researcher has chosen from USA, Japan, and India.
After analyzing the case, it was found that major deficiencies in the Sri Lankan
governance systems as not discharging the fiduciary responsibility by managers and
directors satisfactorily, inadequate role played by the auditors and institutional investors,
and unpaid attention to stakeholder and institutional theory perspectives. In essence,
what Sri Lankan companies need to understand is that ‘Governing’ is a very different job
from ‘Managing’.
