dc.identifier.citation |
Manike, K.R.C.J., Ekanayake, E.M.P. and Piyadasa, R.A.D., 2012. New Set of Primitive Pythagorean Triples and Proofs of Two Fermat’s Theorems, Proceedings of the Annual Research Symposium 2012, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Kelaniya, pp 113-114. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Fermat used the well known primitive Pythagorean set [1], [2],
(1.1)
,where > 0 and are of opposite parity to prove the two theorems
(1) Fermat’s last theorem for
(2) the area of a Pythagorean triangle cannot be a square of an integer.
Historically the above set was well known long ago and no other primitive whole set was available
in the literature. However, the following complete primitive set can be obtained from the
Pythagoras’ equation easily.
The set
(1.2)
where > 0 and are both odd and can be obtained from the Pythagoras
equation
, (1.3)
To obtain this set, assume that is odd and is even. Obviously, is odd.
Then , , and ( ) are co-prime.
Hence , , where , and are odd.
Now, , , , where a > b > 0 and both a, b are odd and coprime,
give the complete primitive set of Pythagorean triples.
2. Proof of Two Theorems
(1) Fermat’s last theorem for can be stated as there are no non-trivial integral triples
satisfying the equation
+ , where is odd.
This can be stated as there is no non-trivial integral triples satisfying the equation:
= .
(2) The second theorem can be stated as there are no integers satisfying the equation
,where = , . (2.2)
In terms of the new Pythagorean triples this can be stated as
= , where are odd. In other words, there are integers
satisfying the equation
= (2.3)
where we have used the fact that are squares.
Now, we will show that there are no non-trivial integer triples satisfying the equation
(2.4)
using the new set of Pythagorean triples, in order to prove the two theorems.
In the following, we prove the two theorems using the method available in the literature [1],
[2] but using the new set of Pythagorean triples:
, ab, and -
If , ,
,
Assume that is the smallest integer satisfying the equation (2.4).
Now, we have - = ,where .
Therefore, we deduce by the method of infinite descent that there are no non-trivial integer
triples satisfying the equations (2.4) or (2.3). This completes the proof of the two theorems. |
en_US |