dc.contributor.author |
Fernando, M.A.S.T. |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Gunathilaka, P.A.D.H.N. |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Hapugoda, M.D. |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
de Silva, B.G.D.N.K. |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Wijeyerathne, P. |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Abeyewickreme, W. |
en_US |
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-06-18T03:53:19Z |
en_US |
dc.date.available |
2015-06-18T03:53:19Z |
en_US |
dc.date.issued |
2012 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Proceedings of the Annual Research Symposium, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Kelaniya. 2012; 13: 50. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
|
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/8354 |
en_US |
dc.description |
Poster Presentation Abstract, Annual Research Symposium, FGS, University of Kelaniya, November, 2012, Kelaniya |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Introduction: Investigating the presence of primary and secondary vectors of malaria in the selected
areas where no entomological surveillance was carried out for about 30 years due to ethnic conflict.
Objective: To study prevalence of malaria vector in Ampara District and to assess the risk of malaria
in the area.
Method: Surveillance was preformed from January 2011 to June 2012 in 4 selected areas (i.e.
Panama, Thirukkovil, Mahaoya and Dehiattakandiya) in Ampara District. From each area 4 localities
(total 16 localities) were selected for the sample collection in order to ensure full coverage of the
District. Cattle Baited Hut Collection (CBHC) and Cattle Baited Net Collection (CBNC) were
performed as sample collecting methods on monthly basis throughout the surveillance period.
Results: Mosquito densities for each collected Anopheles species were calculated as density per hut
or net for CBHT and CBNT respectively. 14 Anopheles species were recorded from CBHC with high
prevalence for An. subpictus (68.58%), An. nigerrimus (14.02%) and An. vagus (6.73%). 16
Anopheles species were recorded from CBNC with high prevelance of An. nigerrimus (50.07%), An.
peditaeniatus (16.12%), An. pseudojemesi (9.21%) and An. subpictus (7.68%). An. culicifacies
(primary malaria vector in Sri Lanka) recorded with lesser densities but An. subpictus, the secondary
vector for malaria in Sri Lanka was predominant thorough out this study.
Conclusions: The presence of primary and secondary malaria vectors in the area may cause a malaria
epidemic in these areas. Hence, it is essential to study the seasonal prevalence of Anopheles species in
order to initiate timely controlling measures in Ampara District. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
University of Kelaniya |
en_US |
dc.subject.mesh |
Malaria |
en_US |
dc.subject.mesh |
Malaria-epidemiology |
en_US |
dc.subject.mesh |
Anopheles |
en_US |
dc.subject.mesh |
Insect Vectors |
en_US |
dc.subject.mesh |
Prevalence |
en_US |
dc.title |
Prevalence of Anopheline species in Ampara district, Sri Lanka |
en_US |
dc.type |
Conference Abstract |
en_US |