dc.identifier.citation |
Ranaweera, L., Hasan, Rizvi, Salgado, Sujatha, Karunanayake, Aranjan, Salvin, K.A., Fernando, Prasadth, Fernado, Eresha, Wijesooriya, Prabath and Vithanage, Susantha, 2012. Anomalies of the Lumbrical Muscles of the Hand, Proceedings of the Annual Research Symposium 2012, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Kelaniya, pp 145. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Introduction:The human hand occupies a unique position in evolution. The lumbrical muscles, one
of the major constituents of intrinsic musculature in hand, play significantly greater role in the
precision movements of the fingers. There are four cylindrical lumbrical muscles which rise from the
four tendons of flexor digitorumprofundus (FDP) in the hand and pass along the radial side of the
corresponding metacarpophalangeal joint to insert into the dorsal digital expansion of the medial four
fingers. The first and second lumbricals are unipennate while the third and fourth lumbricals are
bipennate. Anomalies of the attachments of the lumbricals are not uncommon and have a significant
value in the design of surgical procedures.
Objectives: To study the possible variations of lumbrical muscles and also document a relevant Sri
Lankan study.
Methodology:This research was carried out as a descriptive study in19 preserved human hands in the
Departments of Anatomy, University of Kelaniya, Ragama.
Results: In 9 (47.4%) hands the lumbricals were normal. Regarding the proximal attachments, the
third lumbrial was unipennate in 3 (15.7%) whereas same architecture for the fourth lumbrical
encountered was 2 (10.5%). Moreover, it was found that 1 (5.3%) of the second lumbricals was
bipennate.
Regarding the distal attachments, the split insertion of the third lumbrial and fourth lumbrical were
observed as 2 (10.5%) and 1 (5.3%), respectively. Interestingly, 1 (5.3%) of the third lumbricals was
inserted on the medial side of the middle finger.
Conclusion: In our preliminary studyof lumbrical muscles of the hand, it was apparent that majority
of the observations are comparable to previous research, while there were a higher percentage of
proximal attachment variations than distal attachment variations in the study group. |
en_US |