Digital Repository

Acute febrile illness: Epidemiology versus clinical judgement

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Premaratna, R.
dc.date.accessioned 2015-08-15T15:57:53Z
dc.date.available 2015-08-15T15:57:53Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.citation International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2012; 16(Sup.1): e63 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1201-9712 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn 1878-3511 (Electronic)
dc.identifier.other http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2012.05.156 en
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/9211
dc.description Abstract of the Invited Presentation (38.022), 15th International Congress on Infectious Diseases(ICID), June 13-16, 2012, Bangkok, Thailand en_US
dc.description.abstract Both epidemiology and clinical judgment are teachings by the father of medicine, the Greek physician. Hippocrates The term Epidemiology derives from the Greek: epi “upon/among” demos “people/district”, logos “study/disclosure”, so literally it means “the study of what is upon the people”. Hippocrates coined the terms endemic for diseases usually found in some places but not in others and epidemic for diseases that are seen at some times but not others. Clinical judgment is the application of information based on actual observation of a patient combined with subjective and objective data that lead to a conclusion; process by which the doctor decides on data to be collected, makes an interpretation of the data, arrives at a clinical diagnosis, and identifies appropriate management actions; this involves critical thinking, problem solving, and decision making. The knowledge of epidemiology is important to narrow down a differential diagnosis in a given situation. However, it should not result in tunnel vision. Furthermore, today epidemiological data together with the advancement of science seem to have shadowed or replaced the most valued history taking and examination taught by Hippocrates. For example, some infections have been overlooked in the middle of a known disease outbreak leading to extended morbidity by the former illness simply due to poor history taking and or examination. Similarly increasingly introduced epidemiology based sophisticated rapid diagnostic tools such as multi-test strips are likely to be misused, misinterpreted or wasted ignoring the value of systematic clinical approach in arriving at a diagnosis. At the same time, today infectious disease aetiologies are fast changing due to globalization, expansion of human travel, travel of bugs and hosts, expanding animal industry, and re-emergence of old bugs. Therefore in addition to having a good knowledge on local, regional and global epidemiology, an infectious disease physician today, should ensure a good clinical sense, broader thinking and an open mind in order to tackle an individual patient. This is the greatest challenge faced by an infectious disease physician compared to a physician attending to a well streamlined management plan of a non-communicable disease. This talk will be supported by case scenarios. © 2012 Elsevier Inc. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.source.uri http://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(12)00308-6/abstract en
dc.title Acute febrile illness: Epidemiology versus clinical judgement en_US
dc.type Conference Abstract en_US
dc.identifier.department Medicine en
dc.creator.corporateauthor International Society for Infectious Diseases en


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference Papers
    Papers presented at local and international conferences by the Staff of the Faculty of Medicine

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account