Digital Repository

Social determinants of obesity in Kalutara District

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author de Silva, A.P.
dc.contributor.author de Silva, S.H.P.
dc.contributor.author Liyanage, I.K.
dc.contributor.author Rajapakse, L.C.
dc.contributor.author Jayasinghe, K.S.A.
dc.contributor.author Kotulanda, P.
dc.contributor.author Wijeyaratne, C.N.
dc.contributor.author Wijeratne, S.
dc.contributor.author Haniffa, R.
dc.date.accessioned 2015-09-17T09:26:24Z
dc.date.available 2015-09-17T09:26:24Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.citation The Ceylon Medical Journal. 2014; 59(Supplement 1):10-11 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0009-0875 (Print)
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/9668
dc.description Oral Presentation Abstract (OP07), 120th Annual Scientific Sessions, Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2014 Colombo, Sri Lanka en_US
dc.description.abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To describe social, cultural and economic determinants of obesity in a representative population in Kalutara METHODS: A cross sectional survey carried out among adults of 35 to 64 years. Applying a stratified random duster sampling method from urban, rural and plantation sectors, 1300 participants were selected. Data gathered using an interviewer administered questionnaire. The body mass index of 23.01 kg/m2-27.50kg/ m2 was considered as overweight and >27.51kg/m2 as obese. Waist circumference (WC) of >90cm and >80cm was regarded as high for men and women respectively. Significance of prevalence of diseases and risk factors across different socio-economic strata were determined by chi square test for trend. RESULTS: Of 1234 adults who were screened age and sex adjusted prevalence of overweight, obesity and abdominal obesity (high WC) were 33.2%, 14.3% and 33.6% respectively. The Muslim population had the highest prevalence of all three categories. Sector, education, income, social status quintiles and area level deprivation categories show-an inverse gradient in obesity categories, mean BM! and mean WC. The differences observed for mean BM! and mean WC between the lowest and .highest groups in these socioeconomic factors were significant. CONCLUSION: There is an inverse gradient of overweight, obese and centrally obese with higher prevalence observed in the more affluent, educated, urban and high income segments of society. In Sri Lanka those in the higher socio economic categories are still at a higher risk of being overweight, obese and having abdominal obesity. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Sri Lanka Medical Association en_US
dc.subject Social determinants of obesity en_US
dc.title Social determinants of obesity in Kalutara District en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference Papers
    Papers presented at local and international conferences by the Staff of the Faculty of Medicine

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account